Which of these fragments requires only a predicate in order to be written as a complete sentence? the state of virginia can be divided into different geographical regions by the atlantic ocean which includes a mountain range?

Answer: B. Pausing before speaking to make the point stronger.

Explanation: A rhetorical device is a tool or a group of tools with the main function of having an effect on an audience (it can be readers or listeners). In the given examples of rhetorical devices the one that is unique to speaking is pausing before speaking to make the point stronger, because when we read something, not necessarily we will make the pauses the author intended to write, but when speaking, pausing is a tool often used to emphasize a point or an emotion.

Answer:

Firstly, theme can be developed by the main components of the story (setting, time period, main characters, central conflict) as well as how they are portrayed by the author. Secondly, the main characters’ actions and reactions to the central conflict indicate the theme through symbolism, mood, and tone.

Themes can directly or inadvertently reveal the deeply held beliefs, social norms, and historical markers of certain cultures.

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct sentence is the C. Against who you think you would compete in the contest?

Explanation:

  The problem that is repeated in all the options is the use of "whom" and "who". They are relative pronouns, "Who" is used as a subject while "whom" is part of the direct or indirect object of a verb or preposition.

  To know which one use you can ask yourself if the answer of the question would be he/she or him/her, in the first case you must use "who" while on the other goes "whom".

  I hope this answer helps you.

The correct sentence is option C. It is “against who did you think you would compete in the contest?”  

EXPLANATION:  

The problem in that question is you are asked to choose the correct use of “whom” and “who”. “whom” and “who” are relative pronouns that are used to substitute the subjects or the nouns in a sentence. The different is, “whom” is used to substitute the direct or indirect object of a verb or preposition, while “who” is used to substitute the subject in a sentence.

The example is the first option, A, she is the person whom he had found sleeping in the library. The correct relative pronoun used in this sentence is “who” instead of “whom” because it substitutes the subject in a sentence. Option B, the musical group who won the top prize are from my hometown, should use the relative pronoun “who” instead of “whom” because it substitutes the subject of a sentence.  

The same with the option D, that author is the one who I saw at the bookstore today, in this sentence, the relative pronoun should be used in this sentence is “whom” instead of “who” because it substitutes the direct object of a verb or preposition.

LEARN MORE:  

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

1. Which of the following is a run-on sentence? brainly.com/question/6394723  

2. Which of the following is the clearest and most effective sentence? brainly.com/question/2863338  

KEYWORDS:  relative pronoun  

Subject: English

Class: 10-12

Sub-chapter: Correct sentence  

A virtue is a habit of good conduct or attitude acquired through effort and God's grace.

A virtue is a habit of good conduct or attitude acquired by human effort aided by God’s grace. In philosophy and theology, this term refers to qualities that enable individuals to live morally good lives and to act in accordance with ethical principles. While virtues require initial effort and self-discipline, over time they become second nature and help in the continuous pursuit of moral excellence, much like how habits streamline routine actions in daily life.

In various philosophical and religious traditions, virtues play a central role in guiding ethical behavior and moral development. For example, in Christianity, virtues like faith, hope, and charity are highly valued. Similarly, in ancient Greek philosophy, virtues such as wisdom, courage, temperance, and justice were considered essential for leading a good life.

Answer:

Seifert's motivation is to investigate Guinevere's unfaithfulness through the eyes of King Arthur. She is utilizing the free-section verse structure and the topical arrangement of association. This is especially appropriate to the verse structure: artists should probably present themes as they pick on the grounds that the class is exploratory in nature. The subtleties picked by Seiffert are appropriate to the verse classification: non-literal language, symbolism, and references.

The metaphorical language that she utilizes, particularly the notice of "similitude," tells the crowd that King Arthur isn't sending to Guinevere these three dark felines for an arbitrary reason. The picture of the three dark felines draws on the affiliations that perusers have with the shading "dim" and with "felines", to make an image in their brains of King Arthur's learning of Guinevere's activities and his sentiments about those activities.

Arthur appears to need her rebuffed for her conduct, however he wouldn't like to make her activities open. The references that Seiffert utilizes state succinctly that she should pay for her activities with her demise.

The concept of 'standing on the very proudest' relates to moments in literature where characters assert their rights and personal power, reflecting both empowerment and the potential for conflict with societal or moral laws.

The passages provided illuminate the theme of asserting one's rights and the pride or boldness that comes with it. Characters across these excerpts exhibit a strong sense of entitlement or wrestle with the weight of their personal power and the consequences of asserting it. In literature, standing 'on the very proudest' can symbolize a character's confrontation with their pride, their perceived right to act, or a pivotal moment of self-assertion. This moment can be seen as both empowering and dangerous, as it often involves a conflict between personal desires and societal or moral laws.

A run-on sentence can be corrected by using a semicolon to separate two closely related independent clauses, such as 'Orville was almost thirty-five; his tummy had started to stick out.'

An example of a run-on sentence is 'People who read learn very quickly it's a proven fact.' This sentence should be divided into two separate sentences or joined with appropriate punctuation such as a semicolon or conjunction. An example of a correctly used semicolon is 'I like ice cream; it is delicious.' This sentence connects two related independent clauses without the use of a coordinating conjunction.

To correct a run-on sentence using a semicolon, you can revise: 'Orville was almost thirty-five his tummy had started to stick out.' to 'Orville was almost thirty-five; his tummy had started to stick out.' Here, the semicolon separates and emphasizes two closely related ideas.

Answer:

Sentence containing a participial phrase: RISING EARLY, Lucy was able to do all the pending chores.

Word modified by the phrase: Lucy

Explanation:

A participial phrase is a phrase consisting of a participle (whether present or past) and their modifiers, and that acts as adjective, that is, it describes or modifies nouns. There are two types of participles: the present participle, which ends in -ing, like winning, and the past participle which is formed from the past tense of a verb, and therefore they usually have the endings -ed, -d, -t, -en, or -n, such as smiled, thought and swollen.

What follows is a sentence containing a participial phrase:

Rising early, Lucy was able to do all the pending chores.

In this sentence, Rising early is a participial phrase because it consists of a participle: rising, and an adverb which is the modifier of that participle: early, and it acts as an adjective, modifying and giving us information about Lucy, which is a noun, and also the subject of the sentence.

Final answer:

The scar in 'Lord of the Flies' symbolizes the damaging impact of humanity and serves as a physical reminder of the boys' loss of innocence and the inherent evil within human nature.

Explanation:

In Lord of the Flies, the scar caused by the plane crash that strands the boys on the island symbolizes the destructive impact of humanity on nature and the mark that society leaves on individuals. Throughout the novel, the scar serves as a reminder of the boys' connection to the adult world and civilization, even as they descend into savagery.

Like the bodily marks mentioned in LibreTexts, such as scars or necklaces that can be tokens of identity or experience, the scar in Lord of the Flies becomes a powerful and visible symbol of the boys' loss of innocence and the damage inflicted by their actions, both on their environment and each other.

It reflects the novel's key themes of the inherent evil within humanity and the thin veneer of civilization that separates orderly society from chaos.

President George Washington warned against political parties, asserting they could threaten national unity and weaken government administration. He believed true patriotism involved prioritizing common good and national interests over factional conflicts.

President George Washington's thoughts about political parties are a significant aspect of his farewell address, which reinforces his claim about patriotism. Washington warned that political parties could serve to "distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration" and that partisanship would "kindle the animosity of one part against another," thereby undermining national unity. He stressed the need to prioritize the common good and national interests over sectional and factional interests, which he believed was essential for true patriotism.

Washington's belief in maintaining national unity was further reinforced by his collaboration with James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. Despite their ideological differences, Washington, Madison, and Hamilton collectively emphasized subordinating sectional and ideological differences for the larger national purposes of the country, thus underscoring the essence of patriotism as placing the nation's well-being above all else.

After analyzing each sentence and the way they are written, we can choose the following as the correct one:

C. Zev exclaimed when he opened the door, "Welcome to my home."

When quoting what someone has said, we must pay attention to the correct use of capital letters and punctuation. The following rules are useful:

With the information above in mind, we can select letter C as the correct option.

Learn more about capitalization here:

https://brainly.com/question/404382

Answer:C. Zev exclaimed when he opened the door, "Welcome to my home."

Explanation:

Answer:i believe the answer is false

Explanation: it does state that he thinks she should have been born a boy but it doesn’t mention that she’s strong and violent so the question is true but not completely so the answer is false

What the other person said. The correct answer is true.

A renowned example of this is a poem Jabberwocky by Lewis Carroll which is completely made up of ridiculous words yet is completely grammatically accurate and can be evaluated as such.

the answer would be proteins

Autobiography is related to literary nonfiction because Autobiography is an example of literary nonfiction. Therefore, option C is the correct option.

Nonfiction is a form of literary genre that depicts real events unlike the image or create ones that are depicted in fiction books. Literary non-fiction is a unique genre that creates a story plot and character and so on, on real events which have already taken place in either the author's or someone else’s life.

An autobiography is the depiction of life events of the author which is written by the author himself. It generally contains all the good and bad events of the author's life.

Thus, autobiography is an example of literary nonfiction, it is tied to this genre. Option C is therefore the best choice.

Learn more about non-fiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/10319180

#SPJ5

The syntax of regular speech, which controls how words are put together into sentences, is one of the essential linguistic features of language.

Speech-on-speech masking is particularly interested in syntactic structure, since it directly relates to the predictability problem.

Additionally, the author can control the reader's attention in a literary section by using syntax. We can access the point the author is trying to express by noting what the author is emphasizing through their syntax. We can start by asking why one thing is highlighted over another.

The placement of words in a phrase to best emphasize emphasis and intention is known as syntax.

Therefore, I would go with that option because the first sentence is put together differently than how we might ordinarily say that phrase.

Learn more about syntax here:

https://brainly.com/question/28182020

#SPJ3

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Edg 2022

This question is incomplete because the options are missing. Here are the options:

The presented myth attempts to explain how important crops originated.

A myth is a narrative that is characterized by explaining the origin of peoples, their customs, the world, among others. Generally, they are fantastic stories that try to clarify the mysteries of life.

According to the above, the previous text is a myth because:

The above ideas are suported by this sentence "From her head grew the three sister plants: corn, beans, and squash"

According to the above, the correct answer is C. and options A and B are not correct because it refers to topics different from the central purpose of the text.

Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/18487597

The myth explains the origin of the Three Sisters cultivation method, where corn, beans, and squash benefit each other's growth, symbolizing the relationship between nature and the Haudenosaunee's spiritual beliefs.

The myth attempts to explain the origins of the Three Sisters cultivation method practiced by the Haudenosaunee people. According to their belief, the Three Sisters - corn, beans, and squash - are gifts from the deities and provide both physical sustenance and a reminder of cultural heritage. In this agricultural technique, which is an example of intercropping, the plants are grown together in a way that each plant supports the others' growth, benefiting the entire crop system.

The Haudenosaunee's Three Sisters cultivation is a sustainable farming method where corn acts as a trellis for beans, beans fix nitrogen in the soil, and squash creates a canopy to prevent weeds and maintain soil moisture. This ancient farming practice symbolizes a harmonious balance between nature and the spiritual beliefs of the Haudenosaunee people and demonstrates the profound knowledge that indigenous cultures had about agriculture, ecosystems, and inter-species plant relationships long before European contact.

https://brainly.com/question/35879270

#SPJ3