Athenians believed in the power of human reason, as guided by philosophers like Socrates, and embraced a human-centric worldview. They valued democracy and civic participation, although this was limited to certain citizens. Greek culture evolved to question traditional values and became open to non-divine explanations of the universe.
Explanation:The Athenians had complex beliefs about human nature and the role of an individual. Influential philosophers like Socrates emphasized the importance of seeking truth through reason, which shifted perspectives from a reliance on traditional stories of gods to a more human-centric worldview. This humanism emphasized the inherent beauty, capability, and creativity of mankind, advocating for a focus on tangible human experiences over divine intervention.
Athenian society valued democracy, where citizens were part of the decision-making process in the Assembly of the People. Although in practice, this was limited to male citizens who could exercise their political rights. Sophists played a role in this democratic structure by teaching rhetoric, despite concerns that their teachings could manipulate public opinion. Furthermore, classical Athenian society upheld a patriarchal system but strived for egalitarian ideals, offering governmental resources to foster inclusivity among citizens.
Greek culture also evolved with exposure to various ideas and cultures through trade, travel, and warfare. This brought about a questioning of traditional values and an openness to the speculation of the nature of the universe without involving deities. In essence, democracy and individual civic involvement became hallmarks of Athenian life, profoundly shaping the culture and daily life in ancient Greece.
HELP ME PLEASE I'LL PICK A BRAINLIEST!!!
Write a paragraph explaining the ways in which Roman influence can be seen in our society today. Use details from the lesson and reading for support.
what enabled american indians to settle in permanent villages ?
American Indians were able to settle in permanent villages due to the development of agricultural techniques, reliable water and food sources, and the construction of homes and storage pits.
Explanation:Around 500 BCE, American Indian groups in the American Southwest began to establish permanent villages supported by farming. Over time, settled villages with permanent homes and large storage pits for maize became common in the region. The agricultural peoples of these villages, such as the Mogollon, Hohokam, and Anasazi, were able to settle in permanent villages because they had developed agricultural techniques, such as cultivating maize, and had access to reliable water and food sources. These villages provided shelter from the environment and allowed for increased food production and storage, which enabled the communities to become more sedentary.
The cultivation of maize enabled American Indians to establish permanent villages by transitioning from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to agricultural practices, leading to settled communities with pit houses for habitation.
Explanation:What enabled American Indians to settle in permanent villages was the development of agriculture, particularly the cultivation of maize. Around 500 BCE, groups in the American Southwest began establishing permanent settlements supported by farming. This transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle allowed for the creation of permanent homes and storage facilities for harvested crops like maize. The agricultural developments were culturally significant and led to the establishment of traditions such as the Mogollon, Hohokam, and Ancestral Pueblo traditions. These communities built pit houses, structures partly underground and covered with wooden poles and dried mud, which were well-suited to extreme temperatures.
Which statement best explains why mills, such as that established by Samuel Slater, were built along rivers?
why was it wrong for the British to tax colonists
The chart below shows the economic cost of two school lunches.
The largest price difference between the two lunches is found in the
A.dessert.
B.side dish.
D.main course.
Answer:
Main course
Explanation:
:)
How did the Scientific Revolution influence the Enlightenment?
a It helped monarchs rule their kingdoms better by implementing natural law.
b It weakened the power of absolute monarchies and promoted constitutionalism.
c It helped the Catholic Church understand the wonders of scientific discovery.
d It promoted the use of reason, observation, and experimentation in social and political life
I POSTEDTHIS BECAUSE EVERYONE IS GETTING IT WRONG!
i know the answer but ifigured since i got it s]wong 3times and finlly got the correct answer icould tell yall
anyways
the correct answer is D. It promoted the use of reason, observation, and experimentation in social and political life
By 661AD, what areas of land did the Islamic Empire include?
Why did the Puritans and Separatists leave England for the New World?
Americans insist on the concept of government.
"One Man, One Vote" or "One Person, One Vote" is a slogan that has been used in many parts of the world where campaigns have arisen for universal suffrage.
It was used in this form in an important legal case in the United States, the United States Supreme Court majority opinion of (1964), and this is what Americans insist on the concept of government.
The Nuremberg Laws identified a jew as someone who
The Nuremberg Law defined a jew as someone who had Jewish ancestors. The Nuremberg law of 1935 was an anti- Semitic law passed by the Hitler. It denied equality, liberty, rights and citizenship to Jews.
It defined a jew as anyone who had at least one grandparent a jew, whether such person was practicing Judaism or not. So Ancestry was used to test the Jewish people.
The Nuremberg Laws were anti-Semitic and racist laws enacted in Nazi Germany on September 15, 1935, at a special meeting in the Reichstag convened during the Nazi Party's annual Nuremberg Rally. The two laws were the Law for the Safety of German Blood and German Honour, which prohibited Jewish-German marriages and extramarital affairs, as well as the employment of German females under 45 within Jewish households, and the Reich Citizenship Law, which stated that only those of German or related blood could be Reich citizens.
Learn more about Nuremberg law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9286721
#SPJ2
The Nuremberg Laws defined a Jew as someone with three or more Jewish grandparents and led to the segregation and deprivation of rights for Jewish people under Nazi rule in Germany.
The Nuremberg Laws, enacted by the Nazi government in 1935, were a series of laws that institutionalized the racial theories dominant in Nazi ideology. These laws defined a Jew as anyone with three or more Jewish grandparents. People with two Jewish grandparents were designated as Mischlinge (mixed-blood), a separate category which offered some marginal status exemptions from the full implications of other anti-Semitic laws. The legislation stripped Jews of German citizenship, prohibited marriage or extramarital relations between Jews and those of "German blood," and imposed many other discriminatory measures. The overarching aim of the Nuremberg Laws was to segregate Jews from the so-called Aryan race and to deprive them of rights and protections under German law.
As a result of British-led raids along the Chesapeake Bay during the War of 1812, the British
burned down the White House.
ended the British-American Indian alliance.
forced the US to sign a peace treaty.
destroyed several American shipyards.
As a result of British-led raids along the Chesapeake Bay during the War of 1812, the British burned down the White House. Thus the correct answer is A.
What was a war of 1812?British abuses of American maritime rights led to the United States and Great Britain participating in the War of 1812.
As a result of British-led raids, several political and military structures, including the White House, were set on fire by British soldiers.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about the War of 1812, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13899658
#SPJ2
1. Write an essay describing three innovations of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and their effect on life in the United States.
Give one argument in favor of the Tea act and one argument against the Tea act?
If the governor vetoes a bill, what is required for the General Assembly to override his veto? A) a unanimous vote B) a 2/3 majority vote C) a 3/4 majority vote D) a simple majority vote
Answer:
a 2/3 majority vote.
Explanation:
I did it on usatestprep :)
Explain the key difference between woodrow wilson's moral diplomacy and teddy roosevelt's "big stick" diplomacy.
Teddy Roosevelt's 'Big Stick' Diplomacy focused on showing power to maintain peace and deter conflicts, whereas Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy promoted democratic and peaceful conduct of international relations with an emphasis on ethical actions and human rights.
Explanation:The primary difference between Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy and Teddy Roosevelt's 'Big Stick' Diplomacy lies in their approach to foreign relations. Teddy Roosevelt's 'Big Stick' Diplomacy is characterized by a demonstrative display of strength, where potential force is used as a deterrent to maintain peace and prevent conflicts. It implored the motto 'speak softly and carry a big stick.'
On the other hand, Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy embodied a more peaceful paradigm. This policy promoted democracy and peace internationally with the focus on human rights, national integrity, and opportunity. Wilson believed nations should conduct their affairs ethically rather than through aggression or imperialism, basing relations off of moral principles opposed to material interests.
Learn more about Diplomatic Policies here:https://brainly.com/question/4295879
#SPJ12
The Temple became the dwelling place of the priests after it was consecrated.
True
False
Who sponsored the Dutch settlements in America?
-Henry Hudson
-Peter Minuit
-Dutch West India Company
Answer:
Option: Dutch West India Company
Explanation:
The Dutch settlers in New World were brought by the Dutch East India Company in 1615, establishing Fort Nassau. The settlement established on the purpose of trading with the Native Indian for fur. The Dutch settlers relatively small in comparison to the English had the purpose of getting rich by making a profit by the trade.
5. What does it mean when a Supreme Court justice issues a dissenting opinion? The justice disagrees with the majority opinion. The justice agrees with the majority opinion. The majority opinion will be corrected. The majority opinion will be appealed.
The justice disagrees with the majority opinion.-Gradpoint Answer
Following World War II, many Americans had a chance to go to college for the first time. What impact did this have on the economy? ( multiple answers)
-There was a surge of white-collar workers.
-It created a shortage of blue-collar workers.
-There was a jump in technological advances.
-It created a shortage of white-collar jobs.
The correct answers are A) there was a surge of white-collar workers and B) it created a shortage of blue-collar workers.
Following World War II, many Americans had a chance to go to college for the first time. This impacted the economy in that there was a surge of white-collar workers and it created a shortage of blue-collar workers.
The United States lived a time of growth and prosperity after World War II. American corporations grew a lot after the war. Many large corporations developed companies overseas because labor cost was cheaper. Many new workers incorporated to US corporations. Most of the workers provided services instead of producing goods. Companies that provided services grew and expanded and hired many white-collar workers that had graduated from College.
Why do you think Benedictine monks were only allowed a few simple possessions
Benedictine monks were only allowed a few simple possessions because it reflected the principles of simplicity, humility, and detachment from worldly goods that were central to their religious beliefs.
In the Benedictine tradition, personal ownership was considered a vice because it was believed to foster attachment to material possessions and distract individuals from their spiritual pursuits. By limiting the monks' possessions to only what was necessary for their basic needs, such as clothing, bedding, and tools for work, the Benedictine Rule aimed to cultivate a sense of detachment from material wealth and encourage a focus on spiritual growth and service to others. Additionally, the simplicity of their possessions promoted equality among the monks, as everyone lived according to the same standard of modesty and humility. By renouncing personal ownership and embracing a communal lifestyle centered on prayer, work, and mutual support, Benedictine monks sought to live out the teachings of Jesus Christ and follow the example of the early Christian disciples who shared everything in common. Therefore, the restriction on personal possessions among Benedictine monks was rooted in their commitment to living a life of simplicity, poverty, and devotion to God.
The complete Question is given below:
Why do you think Benedictine monks were only allowed a few simple possessions? Why was personal ownership a vice?
write an advertisement for a newspaper in England that encourages people to come to America in the 1600s
Answer:
America, a new land full of culture and resources to be discovered. Take the risk and get in a trip to America and discover all new posibilities of growth.
Explanation:
In the 1600 America was a land full of culture and new spaces, and most important, resources.
who was Bernardo Alberto Houssay why was he important
Bernardo Alberto Houssay was an Argentine physiologist famous for his discovery of the pituitary gland's role in regulating blood sugar levels. He received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1947 for his groundbreaking work. Houssay made significant contributions to our understanding of the endocrine system.
Bernardo Alberto Houssay was an Argentine physiologist born on April 10, 1887, and is well known for his groundbreaking work in the field of Medicine and physiology. His most significant contribution to science was the discovery of the role played by the pituitary gland in regulating blood sugar levels. This crucial discovery earned him the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1947, making him the first Latin American scientist to receive this honor.
Houssay's research helped to advance our understanding of how the endocrine system regulates various bodily functions, leading to improved treatments for disorders related to blood sugar, such as diabetes. Through his extensive body of work, he has had a lasting impact on the medical field and is considered a pioneer in endocrinology.
what are three important ideas in the declaration of independence
How did the Massachusetts government respond to the shays rebellion
Final answer:
The Massachusetts government responded to Shays' Rebellion by raising a privately funded militia led by Governor James Bowdoin and defeating the rebels in a series of confrontations, including the significant one at the Springfield Armory. Afterward, the state enacted punitive legislation to discourage further insurrection.
Explanation:
The Massachusetts government responded to Shays' Rebellion with a series of measures intended to quell the uprising and restore order. When the indebted farmers led by Daniel Shays began their protests and marches towards courthouses demanding relief, they were faced with the refusal of the Massachusetts militiamen to arrest the rebels, many of whom were sympathetic to their cause. Governor James Bowdoin, unable to secure aid from the national government, took matters into his own hands.
Governor Bowdoin, with financial backing from wealthy Boston merchants, raised a private militia without the legislature's approval. This private army consisted of forty-four hundred men and effectively confronted the rebels. The rebellion's climax occurred in January 1787 at the Springfield Armory, where the rebel forces were defeated by the state-loyal militia, although the insurrection continued into February. Subsequently, the Massachusetts legislature enacted punitive legislation designed to punish the rebels, offering clemency to those who took an oath of allegiance while empowering local officials to use deadly force against all others.
Which of the following is likely to happen to Christianity in the future? It will become an ethnic religion. Divisions between branches will diminish. Adherents will halt missionary practices. Smaller branches will cease to exist as the largest branches prosper. More branches will appear as new churches are founded.
Answer:
The correct answer is: more branches will appear as new churches are founded.
Explanation:
This is likely to happen to Christianity in the future because it is the natural course of evolution. The new inhabitants of the world will have a broader scope thanks to the findings and studies of the ones that came before them. So, new branches with new concepts and understandings are likely to appear.
It is not likely to become an ethnic religion since the number of adherents throughout the world is huge, and they are not likely to halt (stop) their missionary practices either since their goal is to draw more people towards them. Divisions between branches are not likely to diminish since every branch holds on to their specific set of beliefs.
Which goal was most likely to be supported by both poor peasants and wealthy city merchants in the early years of the French Revolution?
A. an end to feudal privileges
B. overthrow of the monarchy
C. destruction of the power of the Catholic Church
D. suppression of the Third Estate
The correct option is A
The French Revolution was a social and political conflict, with various periods of violence, which convulsed France and, by extension of its implications, other nations of Europe that faced supporters and opponents of the system known as the Old Regime.
Although, after the First Republic fell after the coup d'état of Napoleon Bonaparte, the political organization of France during the nineteenth century oscillated between republic, empire and constitutional monarchy, the truth is that the revolution marked the final end of feudalism and of absolutism in that country, and gave birth to a new regime where the bourgeoisie, supported sometimes by the popular masses, became the dominant political force in the country. The revolution undermined the foundations of the monarchical system as such, beyond its death throes, to the extent that it overthrew it with a discourse and initiatives capable of rendering it illegitimate.
According to the online content encyclopedia article about maps, which kind of map is the most basic kind of map that can be used to find and describe places?
Answer:
its a general reference map
Explanation:
Which statement accurately describes John Calvin?
a. a Dutch humanist who criticized the Church and the materialism of many Europeans
b. the friar who sold indulgences to raise money for the pope
c. a French scholar who turned the city of Geneva into a center of Protestantism
d. the author of several texts that attempted to prove the existence of God
Answer:
The correct answer is C. a French scholar who turned the city of Geneva into a center of Protestantism
Explanation:
Calvin was Guillermo Farel's main collaborator in the task of continuing in the reform, and Farel managed to influence the expulsion of Geneva from the Church of Rome. Calvin then established in Geneva as a reader of Holy Scripture in the church of St. Peter
In November 1536 Calvin presented a Confession of Faith of 21 articles that the people should accept under oath. In mid-January 1537 he presented another document requesting four basic reforms for the Geneva Church:
Let no one participate in the sacrament if it is not with true piety and genuine reverence. Let the laws concerning marriage be modified.That the children were catechized by their parents, and that at certain times of the year they appeared before the shepherds to make sure that they really learned the Word of God.May the people participate in worship services singing psalms.How does natural law differ from government laws?
Natural law, as defined by Thomas Aquinas and others, is inherent in human nature, universally understood through reason, and encompasses moral principles that govern human actions. Government laws, or human-made laws, are specific to societies, can be changed by human institutions, and serve to maintain social order.
How Natural Law Differs from Government Laws
Natural law and government laws are two distinct types of laws that guide human behavior and social structures. The medieval philosopher Thomas Aquinas defined natural law as the imprint of eternal law on creatures, which governs their actions and is discoverable through human reason. This type of law is seen as universal and inherent in human nature. It encompasses universal moral principles that are seen as a basis for all human conduct. In contrast, government laws, or human-made laws, are established and enforced by human societies to maintain order, justice, and the well-being of its members. These laws can be modified, repealed, or restrained by human authorities and may vary from one society to another.
According to classical natural law theory, natural laws uphold the natural order and are objective. They are not subject to human subjectivity or cultural differences. By contrast, government laws are often termed 'positive laws' which are specifically crafted by human institutions and can be subjective, reflecting the particular needs, values, or beliefs of a society at a given time.
Natural rights, which are derived from natural law, are universal and inalienable and cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws. On the other hand, legal rights are conferred by a legal system and can be modified or limited by government action. John Locke, for instance, emphasized that natural law obliges everyone to respect the life, health, liberty, and possessions of others, whereas Jeremy Bentham criticized the idea of natural rights as 'nonsense upon stilts.'
what are the events of the Mississippi Bubble in order
The Mississippi Bubble was a financial crisis initiated by John Law in France between 1718-1720, starting with the founding of Banque Royale and the Compagnie d'Occident and ending with a catastrophic collapse in 1720 after stock prices soared and then plummeted.
The Mississippi Bubble was a famous speculative bubble that took place in France between 1718 and 1720. It was orchestrated by John Law, a Scottish financier, who convinced the French government to allow him to open a bank that could issue paper money, the Banque Royale. Following the establishment of the bank, Law also created the Compagnie d'Occident (Mississippi Company) to control commerce and trade in the French colonies of North America.
The sequence of events for the Mississippi Bubble is quite specific:
John Law established the Banque Royale and began issuing paper money.The creation of the Compagnie d'Occident which had a monopoly over French colonial trade.The rise in shares of the Compagnie d'Occident as investors flocked to purchase them, believing in the potential wealth from the colonies.The peak of the bubble, where share prices reached astronomical levels.1720: The collapse of the bubble as prices plummeted and investors scrambled to sell off their shares, leading to financial ruin for many.Despite the calamity, John Law's financial innovations laid important foundations for modern financial systems, though his bubble also served as an early warning of the risks associated with speculation and leveraging.