Final answer:
The statement is false; living conditions in West and East Berlin were significantly different due to the capitalist system in West Berlin and the communist system in East Berlin. The West prospered while the East faced economic challenges and political repression, leading to a mass exodus to the West until the construction of the Berlin Wall.
Explanation:
The statement that the living conditions of West and East Berlin were very similar despite living under different systems is false. After World War II, Germany was divided into East Germany and West Germany, separated by what Winston Churchill described as the Iron Curtain. East Germany was under the influence of a Communist government supported by the Soviet Union, while West Germany operated as a capitalist democracy. These distinct political and economic systems led to divergent living conditions.
East Berlin experienced economic stagnation due to the Soviet Union's insistence on reparation payments and suppression of political dissent. This led to a decline in living standards and prompted skilled laborers and professionals to flee to West Berlin, which was prospering. The significant migration of residents from East Berlin to West Berlin was a testament to the varying conditions between the two sides. The construction of the Berlin Wall by the Soviets was a desperate measure to stop this migration, highlighting further the disparities.
The Western powers, in contrast, supported the recovery of West Berlin through measures such as the introduction of a new currency, the Deutsche Mark, and the famous Berlin Airlift during the Soviet's Berlin Blockade. These efforts sustained and eventually improved the living conditions in West Berlin, making them notably different from those in East Berlin. Over the years leading up to Germany's reunification in 1990, West Berlin became a symbol of Western capitalist prosperity contrasting starkly with East Berlin's Communist austerity.
What effect did John brown raid and execution have in the north
John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry and his execution injected further tensions between the North and South. It stirred fears in the southern states, pushing them closer to secession, and inspired many Northern abolitionists, though not all agreed with his violent methods. This heightened sectional tensions and contributed to the onset of the Civil War.
Explanation:John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry and his subsequent execution had significant effects in the North. Many abolitionists saw Brown as a martyr for the antislavery cause. His bold, violent actions against the institution of slavery further exacerbated tensions between the North and the South, ultimately contributing to the onset of the American Civil War.
Brown's intensity of purpose and his willing to pursue violent means to end slavery were seen by some northerners as valiant. However, not all Northern abolitionists supported Brown or his methods. People like William Lloyd Garrison, a pacifist abolitionist, preferred a non-violent approach. Regardless, the impact of Brown's actions was immense - it intensified the discourse about slavery and provoked greater urgency and tension in the ongoing debates.
Brown's raid also stirred significant fear in the South, as it seemed to confirm their worries about a Northern majority willing to overthrow the institution of slavery by any means necessary. This fear set the stage for increased sectional differences, leading to the secession of several Southern states and eventually the Civil War.
Learn more about John Brown's Raid here:https://brainly.com/question/30093485
#SPJ3
HELP ASAP! BRAINLIEST!!
Use the passage to answer the following question:
"I can see no reason to doubt but the imposition of taxes, whether on trade, or on land, or houses, or ships, on real or personal, fixed ort floating property, in the colonies is absolutely irreconcilable with the rights of the colonists as British subjects and as men. I say men, for in a state of nature no man can take my property from me without my consent: if he does, he deprives me of my liberty and makes me a slave."
—James Otis, 1763
Who is the main audience Otis is writing to in this excerpt?
The members of the Constitutional Convention
Those colonists already joined in the fight for freedom
Those colonists who might still feel loyal to the crown
The British aristocracy charged with governing the colonies
The colonist who were still loyal to Britain.
Otis was not even addressing a "fight" for freedom, since the fight had not begun yet in 1763. He was arguing that the colonists were British citizens and must have a voice in Parliament when colonial affairs (such as taxes) were considered, and the taxes imposed. Think about what was going on in 1763 with the imposition of taxes to pay for the French and Indian (and European) wars. Who imposed those taxes without the consent of the colonists? Who would Otis protest to?
The main audience Otis is writing to in this excerpt are those colonists who might still feel loyal to the crown.
Otis argued that the colonists are British citizens and must have their place in Parliament regarding colonial affairs. He explains that the colonist are also human, and they also have the same rights as English men in England.Continuous imposing taxes and laws represent that colonies are not seen as equal as British.He further says that colonists have no right to fight for their things as their liberty are taken away.Therefore we can conclude that James Otis wants those people who are loyal to the crown to understand the issues.
Thus option C. is the correct answer.
Learn more about James Otis here:
brainly.com/question/7947556
HELP NOT MUCH TIME! ASAAPPPPPP
Case Study: General Andrew Jackson: Andrew Jackson's military career spanned several wars including the American Revolution, the Creek War, the War of 1812, and the First Seminole War. After the Creek War, Jackson and the Creek Indians signed the Treaty of Fort Jackson in which the Creeks ceded lands in Georgia and Alabama to the U.S. During the War of 1812, Jackson drove the British out of New Orleans and Florida, thereby proving the strength of the newly formed United States. After the Creek Indians ceded their lands in Georgia and Alabama, many of their leaders, known as the Red Sticks, fled to Florida. In 1818, Andrew Jackson invaded Florida in search of the Red Sticks. In 1819, the Spanish ceded Florida to the U.S.
Using the map, what can you infer about how these two events were related?
A. Jackson's attacks showed how weak Spain was in Florida.
B. The invasion allowed the U.S. to create a treaty with France.
C. Jackson's attacks proved that the Native Americans could not be trusted.
D. The invasion of Florida allowed Jackson a chance to explore new territory.
A. Jackson's attacks showed how weak Spain was in Florida is the correct alternative.
In 1818, Andrew Jackson's hunt for the Red Sticks ended up causing international affairs and diplomacy problems. This happened because the invaded land was Spain's territory and got invaded without any official cause or declarations of war.
Despite the controversy the invasion actually ended up turning Andrew Jackson into a hero and forced the signature of the Adams-Onís Treaty, in 1919. The treaty officially transferred the Florida region to the U.S. from Spanish domain. These events were important for this resolution because even though Spain was angered with the 1818 invasion, it showed their inability to retaliate or conquer back the land. Therefore, the only viable option was for the Spanish to sign the treaty and cede Florida, showing how fragile and unable to the defend the land by the Spanish, relinquishing their last piece of land in the Americas.
Answer: Jackson's attacks showed how weak Spain was in Florida.
what did nationalism in the balkans and a system of military alliances in europe eventually lead
Nationalism in the Balkans and the military alliances in Europe culminated in the outbreak of World War I. A local conflict, sparked by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary, escalated into a global war due to the intertwined alliances between nations.
Explanation:Nationalism in the Balkans, alongside the systemic military alliances existing within Europe, contributed directly to the genesis of the First World War. Nationalism in the Balkans was supported by the promotion of pan-Slavism, fostering a shared identity among Slavic individuals across the Balkans and engendering conflicts with foreign imperial powers like Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. Russia, also being a Slavic nation, was supportive of this nationalist movement since they perceived themselves as the natural protector of the Slavic people.
At the same time, Europe was entrenched in a complex system of military alliances designed to maintain the balance of power and to prevent any single nation from dominating the continent. However, these alliances eventually snowballed a regional conflict into a vast warfare that engulfed the world. When Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist, it led Austria-Hungary to go to war with Serbia. This thus dragged in its ally Russia, and Austria-Hungary's ally, Germany, following their treaty obligations.
As the hostilities heightened, more nations linked through alliances were dragged into the conflict, transforming what was initially a local issue into a global war, known as World War I. In short, the rigidity of the alliance system coupled with the rise of nationalism transformed a regional conflict into a World War, demonstrating the detrimental effects of these two forces when combined.
Learn more about Outbreak of World War I here:https://brainly.com/question/32537036
#SPJ3
What is the cast system
A caste system is a class structure that is determined by birth. Loosely, it means that in some societies, if your parents are poor, you’re going to be poor, too. Same goes for being rich, if you’re a glass-half-full person.
The cast system is a social stratification which has pre-modern origins, was transformed by the British Raj, and is today the basis of reservation in India. It consists of two different concepts, varna and jāti, which may be regarded as different levels of analysis of this system.
HELP ASAP PLZ
On the map above, people who were against slavery were most likely to settle in which states?
a) The region including Missouri and the unorganized territory of the central plains
b )The group of states including those in the Northeastern United States
c) The group of states including those in the Southeastern United States
d )The group of states including the unorganized territory and Northwestern United State
b )The group of states including those in the Northeastern United States
because england started to do petitions and it grew more from there
Answer:
The correct answer option was b) The group of states including those in the Northeastern United States.
Explanation:
The United States was said to have become a nation of two distinct regions, one of which was the group of states including those in the Northeastern United States that was against slavery.
While the other Southern part of the United states, the region including Missouri and West Virginia, was not in favor of ending the slavery.
Explain in your own words why President Bush felt it was to invade Iraq. (15 points positive) What seems to be Saddam Hussein's attitude about fighting in another war with the U.S.? How does Hussein demonstrate this in this Excerpt.( 15 points positive)
He was scared that Saddam had or was developing weapons of mass destruction. The whole thing fell into place as he was blinded by the actions of his father and the previous president.
In my opinion, Bush didn't lie - he was wrong. Not that being wrong in that instance would be considered much better.
President Bush decided to invade Iraq over concerns about WMDs and the broader application of the Bush Doctrine. Saddam Hussein showed defiance by rejecting an ultimatum to leave Iraq, indicating his willingness to engage in conflict. The American media's reluctance to challenge the invasion's rationale could be attributed to the post-9/11 environment and concerns over patriotism and access.
The administration wanted to apply the Bush Doctrine and proactively address perceived threats following the events of September 11, 2001. Despite doubts from some members within his administration, such as Secretary of State Colin Powell, and the lack of conclusive evidence from international and U.S. intelligence reports, the decision was made to proceed with the invasion.
As for Saddam Hussein's attitude about fighting another war with the U.S., he demonstrated defiance by rejecting President Bush's ultimatum to leave Iraq, suggesting that he was prepared to face military conflict. This conveyed a sense of determination and refusal to capitulate to external pressures.
The reluctance of the American media to challenge the Bush administration's justifications for war may have been influenced by the patriotic fervor and the public's fear in the post-9/11 atmosphere, as well as the media's desire to retain access and avoid being seen as unpatriotic.
Which event set a precedent for the rights of free speech and freedom of the press in the colonies?
A. the publication of Poor Richard’s Almanac
B. the Salem witch trials
C. the Zenger libel trial
D. the introduction of public libraries
E. the establishment of the Frame of Government
if im correct it is C. the zenger libel trial.
The correct answer is C) the Zenger libel trial.
The event that set a precedent for the rights of free speech and freedom of the press in the colonies was the Zenger libel trial.
The trial of John Peter Zenger set a precedent for free speech. Zenger was a printer in New York. Coming from Germany, Zenger printed the "New York Weekly Journal," where it exposed the negative conduct and corrupt acts of governor William S. Cosby. The authors of the information were anonymous and Zenger went to prison in 1733 and was accused of attacking the government. A lawyer from Philadelphia named Andrew Hamilton defended him and made and the jury declared him not guilty.
Accused person have the right to
In all cases related to a criminal offence, the accused has the right to a speedy and public trial.
What rights does the accused have?
In all criminal proceedings, the accused has the right to a speedy and public trial before an impartial tribunal in the state and district in which the offense was committed, as a district designated by law, and to know the details of the case. of that
The accused has the right to confront the witnesses who are testifying against him, to compel the production of witnesses who are testifying in his favor, and to the assistance of counsel for his defense. The Constitution contributes to preventing the arbitrary use of power by the government by defending the rights of those who have been charged.
Therefore, the accused person has the right to a speedy and public trial.
To learn more on rights of an accused, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11065190
#SPJ2
what was an outcome of Argentina's dirty war in 1976
Argentina’s dirty war is a name used to call the proces in which the militaries took by force the goverment leaving out of the picture the democracy. It took place from 1976 and 1983. The dictatorship by the militaries was a campaign against people who did not share the same thoughts as them. It was installed what is called state terrorism, in which the militaries persecuted and kidnapped their opponents, usually broke into their houses in the middle of the night, and locked them in clandestine camps settled in all the country. Those people are known as "the disappeared" because no one knew where they took them. As a social outcome, there where more than 30000 disappeared including kidnapped, murdered people, most of them suffered systematic torture. The mothers of the victims after the process started an organization to find their children and after their grandsons who also where took as a hostage when their parents where captured. Nowadays this organization is still functioning.
Answer:
tens of thousands of pro- protesters were killed by military dictatorship in power.-
Explanation:
Definition of realism
the attitude or practice of accepting a situation as it is and being prepared to deal with it accordingly.
Realism, The attitude or practice of accepting a situation as it is and being prepared to deal with it accordingly.
Hope this helps! Merry Christmas
What was the purpose of the first Earth Day event on April 22, 1970?
A. to celebrate spring
B. to plant trees and flowers
C. to protest environmental problems
D. to raise money for the Superfund
C) To protest environmental problems.
Answer:
C) To protest environmental problems. hope this helps :)
Explanation:
How did ancient cultures lay the foundation of many modern ideas?
As an example of an ancient culture laying a foundation for a modern idea, you can take an Ancient Greece and their idea of democracy. Athenians founded ekklesia, where an adult male could participate. They held meetings where they used the voting system to make decisions.
Which form of literature flourished under the Tang Dynasty?
A) essay
B) poetry
C) saga
D) narrative
B) Poetry
Poetry was greatly appreciated since everyone used it for educational purposes and storytelling
Answer:
poetry
Explanation:
Slave state legislators had more power and what part of Congress during the 1850s
The answer is:
In both the House of Representatives and the Senate is where Slave State Legislators had more power during the 1850s.
Explanation:
African Americans primarily favored the Republican Party in the 1850's due to its more tangible efforts in achieving the abolition of slavery. The South had long favored the state's right to legal slavery and was also a Democratic stronghold.
In The Senate, it wasn't until the Compromise of 1850 that California was admitted as a free state, however California agreed to send one pro-slavery and one anti-slavery senator to Congress in order to avoid creating a free state majority in the Senate and keep things even.
Slave State legislatures had more power in THE SENATE during the 1850s.
Whats was the goal of pacifists during word war 1?
Pre-WW1 pacifism was the belief that violence was always immoral, even if someone is trying to kill you. The belief might have been grounded in religious commitment against the killing of human beings or in a secular belief that war could never replace peaceful negotiations as a means of solving disputes.
Which political party advocated states’ rights over federal authority? A. Republican Party B. Democratic-Republican Party C. Democratic Party D. Federalist Party
In what way was the Haitian rebellion like the American Revolutionary War?
A. Both conflicts began as slave revolts
B. Both conflicts involved fighting against the French
C. Both conflicts were mostly about control of scarce resources
D. Both conflicts saw North American colonies break away from European states
Answer:
its b.
Explanation:
sorry if I'm wrong but I believe this is the answer
In what year was the importation of slaves banned in the United States?
I believe the answer is "1807"
Answer:1807
Explanation:This when the importation of slaves was banned
Who were the central powers during ww1
The Austria-Hungary Empire, The Germany Empire, Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Bulgaria.
The Central Powers was Austria-Hungary, Germany, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire. Allied powers were Serbia, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and the United States.
Identify the six essential elements of the study of geography
The World in Spatial Terms
Places and Regions.
Physical Systems.
Human Systems.
Environment and Society.
The Uses of Geography.
The physical geography is the science of the Earth that studies the physical environment, being its main elements: the relief, the terrestrial waters, the climate, the vegetation, the fauna and the soil.
which statement describes the majority party’s power when it comes to senate committees
All sixteen chairpersons are members of the majority party.
Answer:The chair of each committee and a majority of its members represent the majority party, with the chair setting the agenda for committee business. Each party assigns its own members to committees, and each committee distributes its members among its subcommittees. The Senate places limits on the number and types of panels any one senator may serve on or chair.
Each committee hires its own staff, and levels of operating funds varies from committee to committee. The majority party controls most committee staff and resources, but a portion (consistent with party division) is shared with the minority.
progressivism was an early 20th century movement that promoted
Final answer:
The Progressive Era was a time of social activism and political reform, aiming to address the issues of the fast-changing American society through government interventions, grassroots efforts, and the fight for social justice.
Explanation:
The Progressive Era was an influential period in American history, primarily from the 1890s to the 1920s. Its main objective was to rectify social and political issues arising from rapid industrialization, urbanization, and political corruption. Progressives were a diverse range of reformers who aimed to improve society by advocating for government intervention to promote efficiency, social justice, and democracy.
Progressivism was a response to the excesses of laissez-faire capitalism and sought a middle ground between unregulated markets and complete government control. The movement consisted of people from various walks of life, including middle-class Americans, African Americans, and women, all striving for reforms in different areas such as labor laws, women's suffrage, anti-liquor campaigns, and fair pay.
At its core, Progressivism was a grassroots movement that initiated change at the local and state level before escalating to the federal government, thanks in part to the efforts of muckraking journalists who exposed societal inequalities. By pushing for reforms in labor, welfare, education, and housing, the progressives aimed to create a safer and more equitable society for all.
For a person to be convicted of a crime, the evidence must prove the person's guilt A) by a three quarters agreement of jurors. B) with a high degree of certainty. C) beyond a reasonable suspicion. Eliminate D) beyond a reasonable doubt.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Im doing the USA test prep
Which of the following best explains why Chinese immigrants moved to the United States in the 1800s? Chinese immigrants wanted to start their own railroads. Chinese immigrants wanted to send money to their families. Chinese immigrants wanted to escape religious persecution. Chinese immigrants wanted to settle in East Coast cities.
To send money to their families. Chinese large-scale migration to the U.S. began with the First Opium War, a war started by Great Britain against the Chinese Empire in 1839 that lasted until 1842, in wich Britain forced China to recognize them as equals and grant them many unprecendented trade rights. Large-scale chinese migration to america was carachterized by young men who had left their families back home, chinese society was marked by many social nets such as guilds and sometimes they would finance the immigration, some villages and even whole regions arranged for most of their young men to immigrate to America in order to send back money.
Answer:
sned money home to their families on edge
Explanation:
Why didn’t Egyptians never use humor when drawing humans
"Queen Nefertiti was a beautiful black Egyptian queen," wrote an outraged reader, Joan P. Wilson, in a letter to the magazine. "The Egyptians are a black race of people. This doll has creamy white skin color
HELP PLEASE!!!!!
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, what was decided by the Supreme Court?
Discrimination in public schools was illegal.
Blacks had the right to vote.
Segregation was legal.
What is the best definition of automation
Answer:
Explanation:
The use of robotic equipment
Explain how WW2 was more deadly than any war in history? Which country suffered the most?
By the numbers, the WWII was indeed the most deadly war in history as it killed an estimate of 60 to 75 million people. It was the first war that really took multi-continental proportions and affected every country and group of people in the world. It involved around 100 million people and it was marked by mass killings of civilians, like the Holocaust, and atomic bombings. The Soviet Union was the country that suffered the most casualities, civilian and military, losing roughly 15% of its population.
How did the Supreme Court support civil rights during the 1970’s?
Oh I actually did a paper on this! The Supreme Court's main contribution to supporting the civil rights movement was the acts they passed in that area. Although the 60's had more to do with the rights of everyone in general, the 70's focused more on the education system. The busing act was extremely important because it allowed counties to change county guidelines to promote racial integration in public schools. The high school I graduated from was actually the first in my state and that's what I researched! This case is known as Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971) if you want more information. Gates v. Collier also ended legal racial segregation in prisons! Griggs v. Duke made it illegal to use intelligence tests as a requirement for African-Americans to get positions and Lau v. Nicolas made it unconstitutional for schools not to provide English translations to Chinese-speaking students.