Answer:
the growth of cities and towns
Explanation:
apex :)
The spread of Enlightenment ideas during the 18th century was enabled by rising literacy rates, the growth of the public sphere and establishments such as coffeehouses and salons, and the spread of print culture. Despite being initially accessible only to the upper classes, over time, these ideas reached a wider audience and catalyzed important changes in societies and political systems around the world.
Explanation:The spread of Enlightenment ideas was significantly aided by the increasing accessibility of information, facilitated by a number of venues and platforms. Places like coffeehouses, salons, and the emerging concept of the public sphere provided spaces for open discussion and sharing of ideas. Enlightenment thinkers like Voltaire, Benjamin Franklin, and others promoted these ideas through their writings. Nevertheless, only a limited elite could actively participate due to social and economic barriers including high cost of books and low rate of literacy among the lower classes.
More formal institutions such as universities and academies also played a role, but were often restricted to the wealthy, and were less accessible to the general public. However, the rise of reading clubs and lending libraries in the 18th century began to extend the reach of these sophisticated ideas to a broader audience.
Despite these limitations, the Enlightenment ideas left a profound impact on European societies and beyond, challenging traditional authority and promoting values of reason, liberty, and resistance to tyranny. These ideas eventually found expression in revolutionary uprisings, like the American and French Revolutions, thereby transforming the political landscape of the world.
Learn more about Spread of Enlightenment Ideas here:https://brainly.com/question/27884760
#SPJ6
1. An increase in immigration to Minnesota resulted in large part from?
a. tighter immigration laws
b. a rise in global conflict
c. and end to refugee status
d. the Truman Doctrine
2. The Cold War most directly impacted Minnesotans through
a. the Korean and Vietnam wars
b. the Marshall Plan
c. the United Nations
d. the space race
3. The Cold War was not an actual war because
a. no one fought in any conflicts
b. the arms race had ended
c. it took place on television
d. the two key nations did not fight each other directly
An increase in immigration to Minnesota was largely due to a rise in global conflict as a result of the Cold War. The Cold War's most direct impact on Minnesotans came through their involvement in the Korean and Vietnam wars. The Cold War was termed 'cold' because the primary nations, the U.S. and the Soviet Union, did not engage in direct military combat.
Explanation:Cold War Impact on Immigration and Minnesota
An increase in immigration to Minnesota resulted largely from a rise in global conflict, particularly Cold War-related conflicts that displaced many individuals from their home countries. These conflicts, coupled with the United States' ideological battle against Communism, resulted in the U.S. accepting refugees fleeing from communist regimes. Options A, C, and D are less directly related to the rise in immigration seen during this period.
Direct Impact of the Cold War on Minnesotans
The Cold War most directly impacted Minnesotans through involvement in the Korean and Vietnam Wars. These proxy wars, expressing the larger ideological struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union, led to significant military engagements that involved many Americans, including Minnesotans. The Marshall Plan, United Nations, and the space race had impacts on the national scale but were not as direct in their effects on the citizens of Minnesota as the Korean and Vietnam wars.
Nature of the Cold War
The Cold War was not an actual war because the two key nations involved, the United States and the Soviet Union, did not fight each other directly. Instead, they engaged primarily through proxy wars, the arms race, and ideological competition. The conflict was characterized by indirect confrontations and a perpetual state of military and political tension without the occurrence of direct military action between the two superpowers.
British increase taxes on colonists --> Colonists reject taxes passed without representation --> ? --> Declaration of Independence
Which action completes the diagram?
Colonists vote to elect new members of Parliament
British eliminate all taxes on colonists
Colonist send troops to Britain in protest
British ignore colonist grievances
The action that completes the diagram is:
British ignore colonist grievances.
Following the British Constitution, Britain was not allowed to taxate its subordinate colonies without the approval of their representatives in Parliament. But the problem was that these colonies in America were no represented and still had to pay for taxes imposed on them. Soon they clung to the motto "no taxation without representation". This eventually increased tensions between the two and led to the American Revolutionary War (colonies vs Britain), which resulted in the Declaration of Independence.
I think the answer is British eliminate all taxes on colonists
Who were the mound builders
a) hunter gatherers who built mounds
b) farmers near the Mississippi
c) the Iroquois
d) the Navajo
a) hunter gatherers who built mounds
The various cultures collectively termed "Mound Builders" were inhabitants of North America who, during a circa 5,000-year period, constructed various styles of earthen mounds for religious, ceremonial, burial, and elite residential purposes.
the answer is A..hope this helps :))
which step did president john adams take to strengthen the federal government?
1800s, President John Adams orders the federal government to pack up and leave Philadelphia and set up shop in the nation’s new capital in Washington, D.C.
He had told the federal government to pack up and move from Philadelphia to Washington D.C.
Hope this helps!
What type of compensation did Japanese internees receive from the American government? Give your opinion of this compensation.
Explanation:
In 1988, Congress passed, and President Reagan signed, Public Law 100-383 – the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 – that acknowledged the injustice of "internment," apologized for it, and provided a $20,000 cash payment to each person who was incarcerated
SOMEONE HELP ME IM TAKING A TEXT YOU GET 12 POINTS IF ANSWER THANK YOUUUUU
1 Which of the following statement is true about fossils?
A. Fossils are only made from living organisms.
B. Both living and nonliving things can be fossilized.
C. Human bones buried in cemeteries are fossils.
D. Large animals cannot be fossilized.
Choose all the right answers.
2. The image of bird feathers left in a rock is:
A. a cast
B.a mold
C.a burrow
D. an imprint
E.a trace fossil
question number one is A
question number two is D
Everyone always forms educated opinions. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
true
hope this helps :)
The statement that everyone always forms educated opinions is false. Opinions can be misinformed or biased, highlighting the importance of differentiating between facts and opinions and using critical thinking to evaluate information.
The statement 'Everyone always forms educated opinions' is false. Not every opinion is necessarily educated, factual, or well-informed. Many variables can influence the formation of opinions, such as personal biases, false consensus, and a lack of critical thinking skills. It is essential to distinguish between facts and opinions.
Facts are verifiable and objective truths, whereas opinions are subjective and can vary widely between individuals. Area E writing, and academic writings in general, require that opinions be supported by verifiable evidence.
A key component of forming an educated opinion involves using critical thinking skills to evaluate information based on its accuracy and the reliability of the source. Without applying critical thinking, opinions may be based on misinformation or biases, which can lead to incorrect assumptions and statements presented as facts. It is also worth noting that while everyone is entitled to their own opinions, they are not entitled to their own facts, which must be universally true regardless of individual belief.
what is the difference between an implied power and an enumerated power
Enumerated powers are specifically listed in the constitution. Implied powers are not stated specifically but are assumed by the exercise of the enumerated powers.
Enumerated powers are specially listed in the Constitution. Implied powers are not stated specially but are assumed by the exercise of the Enumerated powers.
Which long-standing institution became compromised after the Cold War?
The military-industrial complex
What led to the Tuscarora War between Carolina settlers and American Indians in 1711? Answer choices:- A)The local tribes attacked Jamestown and burned it to the ground. B)The settlers captured American Indians to use as enslaved labor. C)The American Indian tribes began to encroach on the settlers’ land. D)American Indians interfered with trade between the settlers and Britain.
Answer: B) The settlers captured American Indians to use as enslaved labor.
The Tuscarora War was the war that started in the year 1711 and continue till the year 1715. It was fought in North Carolina between the Tuscarora people and their allies on the one side of the war and the other side was of European American settlers, the Yamassee, and other allies.
The correct answer is:
B)The settlers captured American Indians to use as enslaved labor.
The reason for the correct answer:
Option B) The settlers who captured American Indians to use as enslaved labor is correct because the settlers who captured the American Indians led or pointed to the war in the year 1711. They were the reason for the war to get some authority over some parts of the country.
The reason for the wrong answer:
A)The local tribes attacked Jamestown and burned it to the ground.
C)The American Indian tribes began to encroach on the settlers’ land.
D)American Indians interfered with trade between the settlers and Britain.
These options are wrong because these are not the reason for the war instead they are the after effects of the war and the other activities that were continuing during the war itself.
To know more about the Tuscarora War, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/21008463
How did the us use propaganda to unify the American people behind the war effort?
The United States created propaganda that created clear enemies. They did this by making the Germans and the Japanese into grotesque figures that were obviously evil.
Anyone know the outcome of the battle of Locust Grove?
Hello there!
The battle of Locust Grove was a small battle, compared to other battles during the American Civil War. This battle took place on Native American land, due to the fact that they didn't really claim the land yet.
The outcome of the battle of Locust Grove was that the Union won the war. The reason why they won this war is because the Union made a surprise attack against the Confederates, the confederates during the time of the surprise attack were actually split up, so when the attack happened, they would have no time to come together to fight because they were all split up during the fight; giving the Union an advantage during the fight. This attack pretty much applies to the term "It's better to fight in larger groups." The confederates had a hard time during this attack because they were outnumbered by multiple Unions. For example, a confederate could be by themselves while 3 Union members comes and ambush them, and of course the Union would win that small fight because they had more man power, and this pretty much happened during the surprise attack. After the Union beat the confederates, they pretty much took all of their supplies.
how were the peace plans that ended World War II different from the treaty of versailles that ended World War I?
Answer: Its B
Explanation:
Answer:
APE-ex they did not attempt to inflict further damage on the defeated countries.
Explanation:
Give two reasons for U.S. escalation of involvement in the Vietnam conflict.
the assassinations of Ngo Dinh Diem and John F. Kennedy in late 1963 and the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 and the continuing political instability in the South, the United States made a policy commitment to begin joint warfare in South Vietnam
How could having more factories be an advantage during war ?
More factories to be an advantage during war because Union had the large population, people to fight in the war and work in the factories to make war materials.
What is War?War is defined as a fierce armed struggle between nations, governments, society, or paramilitary groups such as mercenaries, insurgents, and militias. It is marked by severe violence, damage, and mortality, and it employs either conventional or irregular military troops.
First, the Union possessed a vast population with which to fight in the war and labor in industries producing war goods. The North also possessed an industrial backbone, as well as factories to manufacture these military munitions. The Union was significantly richer than the Confederacy, allowing it to finance the war. But the Confederacy had its own advantages.
As a result, More industries would be advantageous during the war since the Union had a big population, allowing people to fight in the war and work in factories producing war goods.
Learn more about War here:
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ5
Final answer:
Having more factories can be an advantage during the war because it allows a country to produce weapons and equipment at a higher rate for a longer period of time.
Explanation:
Having more factories can be an advantage during the war because it allows a country to produce weapons and equipment at a higher rate for a longer period of time. This industrial capacity is as important as fighting ability in determining the outcome of a war.
For example, during World War II, the United States became the hub of weapons and military manufacturing, producing more military equipment than any other nation. Its factories were responsible for nearly half of the world's armaments and out-produced the factories of England, France, Russia, Germany, Italy, and Japan combined.
In addition, industrial capacity can also be used for converting civilian factories into wartime production. This flexibility allows a country to rapidly increase its war production and meet the demands of the conflict.
Which answer best explains how Florida became a US territory?
A- the US signed a treaty with the Native Americans
B- Spain in the US signed The Adams Onis Treaty
C- The US defeated Mexico in the war over territory
D- The Monroe doctrine declared Florida a US territory
B - Spain in the US signed the Adams Onis Treaty to allow Florida to become a US territory.
The Adams-Onis treaty signed in 1819 (also known as the Floriday Treaty) ceded Florida to the US.
Answer:
B - Spain in the US signed the Adams Onis Treaty to allow Florida to become a US territory.
Explanation:
i do flvs and this is correct
sometimes known as the spoiler effect a third party candidate has been known to
The answer is: split votes with a candidate from the major party that has similar ideology resulting in the opposing party candidate to win.
When was the last time the US experienced a depression
1930s The Great Depression
Which of the following did not contribute to the dust bowl conditions in the plains states?
A) overplanting if wheat
B) stripping of natural grasses
C) severe drought
D) clear cutting of the region’s forests
clear cutting of the region’s forests
Clear-cutting of the region's forests was not responsible for the dust bowl conditions in the plains states. Option D is correct.
What is the significance of dust bowl conditions in the plains states?The Southern Plains region of the US, that was seriously drought-stricken and fully fledged knockout dust storms during a dry period in the 1930s, was known as the Dust Bowl.
The plains state dust bowl-like conditions were not caused by clear-cutting the region's forests.
Therefore, option D is correct.
To learn more about the dust bowl, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/12458721
#SPJ2
what was the neutrality act of 1935?
The act prevented the US from supplying "arms, ammunition, or implements of war" to nations in conflict. The US was a major oil supplier and Roosevelt chose to continue oil shipments to Italy because the law did not say anything about oil.
What new food product allowed rapid population growth in China during the song era
During the Song era, the new food product that allowed rapid population growth in China was rice which was distributed to prevent famine. The rice distributed prevented famine and led to a rapid increase in population during the Song era. Each year people grew a double crop which produced surplus rice which could be sold in the open market thus led to the accumulation of more wealth in rural areas.
Answer:
Limit
Explanation:
If they limit their population growth then prices will not be so high. The less people, the lower the tax prices.
Go to newsela and read Taoism and Confucianism — Ancient Philosophies. I don’t get any of the questions. P.S the level is 930L
Okay I will try that. I will update you when I figure out the questions.
Final answer:
Taoism and Confucianism are classical Chinese philosophies with the former advocating for a natural and spontaneous way of living, while the latter emphasizes societal harmony through proper relationships and conduct. The Analects and Dao De Jing are central texts for understanding these philosophies.
Explanation:
The student's question pertains to the ancient philosophies of Taoism and Confucianism. These two philosophical systems originated in China during the so-called Warring States period and have significantly influenced East Asian culture and thought. Confucius emphasized harmonizing society through proper conduct, rituals, and relationships, with a strong focus on what he termed 'ren' (human-heartedness) and 'li' (proper behavior). On the other hand, Daoism, as articulated in key texts such as the Daodejing, encourages a life that is in accordance with the natural flow of the Dao (The Way), emphasizing spontaneity and effortless action.
To further understand these philosophies, the analects of Confucius provide a quintessential collection of his teachings, and are invaluable for those studying Confucianism. To gain more perspective on Daoism, the Dao De Jing by Laozi is a foundational text. It is also worth noting that, unlike some Western theistic philosophies, both Confucianism and Daoism do not center around a person-like deity, but rather on ways to achieve harmony in life and society.
Imagine that you are a political leader advising citizens on their country's future. Tell the citizens of this imaginary country wether you think their country should have a one-party, two party, or multiparty political system and why. You must explain the advantages and disadvantges for all party systems. Consider: • characteristics of a two-party system, • Characteristics of a multiparty system, •advantages and disadvantages of a coalition government. If you have already answered this question for someone else please write something different and thank you very much
I will tell the citizens that multiparty political system would be better for the country.
In multiparty system, the legislative body are filled with representatives from several different parties ( meanwhile, our government is dominated by only two parties)
Multiparty system make it far less likely for one party to gain majority control of the government and can do basically anything they want. The power of their party in the government would be limited by the existence of other parties.
Not only that, voters might have different ideologies that cannot fully represented by two parties or less (for example, some people in America could adopt half of republican values and half of demcorats values). Having multiple party in this situations would be beneficial because they offer different alternatives for the voters.
Final answer:
A political leader must weigh the benefits and drawbacks of one-party, two-party, and multiparty systems, considering factors like political stability, representation, and government effectiveness.
Explanation:
Comparing One-Party, Two-Party, and Multiparty Political Systems
As a political leader, advising on the ideal political system for our country is a significant responsibility. It's crucial to consider the implications each system has on policy stability, coalition governments, representation of minor parties, and more. Let's analyze the characteristics of each system along with their advantages and disadvantages.
One-Party System
One-party systems, such as those in China and North Korea, offer a high level of political stability and policy consistency. However, they often lack political diversity and may suppress dissenting opinions.
Two-Party System
In a two-party system, as seen in the United States, two major political parties dominate. The benefits include clear policy alternatives and relative government stability, while disadvantages often involve limited representation for minority viewpoints and potential for political gridlock.
Multiparty System
Multiparty systems, common in Europe, encourage a broader representation of the electorate's views. The trade-off includes the challenge of forming coalition governments, which can hinder policy-making efficiency but also prevent any single party from monopolizing power.
Ultimately, the decision on the political system structure should reflect our nation's values and aim to serve its people's best interests. We must weigh the importance of representation, stability, and the capability to govern effectively when choosing our political system.
Ulysses S.Grant and William T. Sherman’s strategy of total war targeted not only the Confederate army but also
Southern people. He burned his way to Atlanta. Anything in his way or close to him was torched
Answer:
The civilians, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The Total War Strategy was introduced by William T. Sherman during the Civil War. The concept of Total War put no restriction on the use of weapons and there was no law regarding the war. The main aim of the Total War strategy was to destroy the Confederacy's economy and put an end to the ongoing war. The Union knew it had enough resources to protect the North against the South. Consequently, The army of grant destroyed everything including, transportation lines, homes, and civilians.
The scientific revolution popularized the idea that?
Answer:
The scientific revolution brought the idea of understanding that is gained from observation and experiments by researchers.
Explanation:
The scientific revolution aims at the systematic experiment processes, which reaches the most appropriate research method as it regards the human mind as the most powerful thing.
Thus, the scientific revolution emphasized more on observation, examination, and then forming a conclusion for transforming society.
For more information, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/12969280?referrer=searchResults
The Scientific Revolution popularized the concept of an orderly universe ruled by rational laws, laying the groundwork for the Enlightenment's critical examination of human institutions and traditional beliefs, ultimately leading to societal modernization.
Explanation:The Scientific Revolution popularized the idea that the universe was orderly and governed by rational and universal laws. This was a radical shift from the heavily religious and metaphysical view of the cosmos prevalent before this period. The discoveries and methodologies arising from the Scientific Revolution laid the groundwork for the Enlightenment, spurring critical examination of not just the natural world, but also human institutions like the monarchy and the church. Figures such as Newton propelled society towards a more empirical and rational worldview, which was characterized by the application of scientific methods to understand and improve the human condition. This dramatic turn in thought triggered the modernization of society, allowing technological advancement and the spread of capitalism as people began to critically engage with new information to reshape their understanding of the world.
In the late 1800s, which of the following did the People’s Party believe would give the people more political power?
Answer: choosing senators through direct election
which third party wants little to no government interference
The correct answer is the libertarian party.
The libertarian party is a right wing party that believes in little or no government involvement.
how much national debt did texas acquire after the texas revolution
The Republic of Texas inherited from the provisional and ad interim governments a debt estimated at $1.25 million. Of this, $100,000 was in the form of loans and the remainder in the form of claims for services and supplies.
Hope this helps!!!
Answer:
1.25 million
Explanation:
How is the position of Muslim women problematic in the West? To what extent is this an inherent part of Islam?
Answer: The experiences of Muslim women vary widely between and within different societies.
Explanation:I think
Who was Grigory Rasputin, and how did he affect Czar Nicholas ll’s power?
Grigory Rasputin was a wandering monk and faith healer who gained influence over Tsar Nicholas II's wife, Alexandra. His supposed ability to stop their son's bleeding and his scandalous lifestyle affected public support for the monarchy.
Explanation:Grigory Rasputin was a wandering monk and faith healer who gained considerable influence over Tsar Nicholas II's wife, Alexandra. He was believed to have the power to stop the bleeding of their hemophiliac son, which led to the Tsarina's strong belief that Rasputin was sent by God to protect the royal family. Rasputin's influence over the Tsarina and his scandalous lifestyle contributed to the erosion of public support for the monarchy and the Tsar's power.
Final answer:
Grigory Rasputin was a Siberian mystic whose relationship with Czar Nicholas II's family shaped Russian politics, contributing to the erosion of the monarchy's authority and setting the stage for the Russian Revolution.
Explanation:
Grigory Rasputin and Czar Nicholas II
Grigory Rasputin was a Siberian peasant turned mystic and faith healer, who became one of the most enigmatic figures in Russian history. His close association with the family of Czar Nicholas II largely stemmed from his ability to alleviate the suffering of the tsar's hemophiliac son, Alexei. Despite being illiterate and having scandalous practices, his apparent healing powers earned him the trust of Tsarina Alexandra, making him a significant influence within the royal household.
During World War I, the already vulnerable political situation in Russia deteriorated further when Nicholas II took command of the military front. In his absence, Rasputin's influence over the Tsarina and thus the affairs of state increased, contributing to widespread corruption and ultimately contributing to the erosion of the monarchy's authority. This, coupled with military defeats and the Russian elite's distrust of Rasputin, sparked a conspiracy that led to his assassination in 1916. Nonetheless, by the time of Rasputin's death, the damage to Czar Nicholas II's power and the monarchy's reputation was irreparable, paving the way for the rise of the Bolsheviks and the eventual Russian Revolution.